WC3 TrackerMapsCircle Td Eternal 1.3d.F vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,190 recorded sessions versus 26. Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F averages more players per lobby (5.6 vs 3.4), suggesting larger games. Survivalchaosreborn lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 4.6 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricCircle Td Eternal 1.3d.FSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions2612,190
Unique hosts5553
Avg players/lobby5.6 3.4
Avg lobby open time4.6 min2.4 min
Sessions (30d)263,207
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
2
2,769
Jun 26
1
10,783
Jul 26
26
4,684

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,190 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 26 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F has more players per lobby on average (5.6) than Survivalchaosreborn (3.4).
Survivalchaosreborn lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 4.6 min for Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,207 vs 26). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Circle Td Eternal 1.3d.F has been hosted by 5 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.