WC3 TrackerMapsCircle Td Eternal 1.1b.F vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 2. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 4), suggesting larger games. Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F Warofraces
Head to Head
MetricCircle Td Eternal 1.1b.FWarofraces
Total sessions27,637
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby44.6
Avg lobby open time3.5 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)21,594
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJul 8, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
2
2,379

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 2 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F (4).
Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F lobbies fill faster, sitting open 3.5 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,594 vs 2). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Circle Td Eternal 1.1b.F has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.