WC3 Tracker›Maps›Castle Defense Beta Tft vs Survivalchaosreborn
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Castle Defense Beta Tft vs Survivalchaosreborn

Survivalchaosreborn is the more popular of the two, with 12,201 recorded sessions versus 1. Survivalchaosreborn averages more players per lobby (3.4 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Survivalchaosreborn lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 2.7 min for Castle Defense Beta Tft. Over the past 30 days, Survivalchaosreborn has seen more activity.

Castle Defense Beta Tft Survivalchaosreborn
Head to Head
MetricCastle Defense Beta TftSurvivalchaosreborn
Total sessions112,201 ▲
Unique hosts1553 ▲
Avg players/lobby23.4 ▲
Avg lobby open time2.7 min2.4 min ▲
Sessions (30d)13,228 ▲
Tracked versions139
Last hostedJul 9, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
2,769
Jun 26
0
10,783
Jul 26
1
4,753
Explore Each Map
Castle Defense Beta Tft full stats → Survivalchaosreborn full stats → Watch live Castle Defense Beta Tft lobbies Watch live Survivalchaosreborn lobbies All map rankings →

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Castle Defense Beta Tft and Survivalchaosreborn on Warcraft 3

Survivalchaosreborn is more popular, with 12,201 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Survivalchaosreborn has more players per lobby on average (3.4) than Castle Defense Beta Tft (2).
Survivalchaosreborn lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.4 min on average versus 2.7 min for Castle Defense Beta Tft. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Survivalchaosreborn has had more sessions in the last 30 days (3,228 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Castle Defense Beta Tft has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Survivalchaosreborn by 553. Survivalchaosreborn has the wider host base.