WC3 TrackerMapsBloodelfrelease vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bloodelfrelease vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 18,530 recorded sessions versus 1. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.2 vs 2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 3.9 min for Bloodelfrelease. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Bloodelfrelease Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBloodelfreleaseDirect Strike
Total sessions118,530
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby25.2
Avg lobby open time3.9 min1.6 min
Sessions (30d)19,784
Tracked versions171
Last hostedJun 4, 2026Jun 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 2 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
1
10,531

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bloodelfrelease and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 18,530 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 1 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.2) than Bloodelfrelease (2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.6 min on average versus 3.9 min for Bloodelfrelease. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,784 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bloodelfrelease has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.