Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,637 recorded sessions versus 79. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 3.4), suggesting larger games. Bleed Overload Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.
Comparing Bleed Overload Td and Warofraces on Warcraft 3
Warofraces is more popular, with 7,637 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 79 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than Bleed Overload Td (3.4).
Bleed Overload Td lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,584 vs 79). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bleed Overload Td has been hosted by 15 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.