WC3 TrackerMapsBleed Overload Td vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Bleed Overload Td vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,488 recorded sessions versus 82. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3.5), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for Bleed Overload Td. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Bleed Overload Td Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBleed Overload TdDirect Strike
Total sessions8247,488
Unique hosts151,615
Avg players/lobby3.55.3
Avg lobby open time2.6 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)829,730
Tracked versions3104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
82
14,415

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Bleed Overload Td and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,488 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 82 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Bleed Overload Td (3.5).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for Bleed Overload Td. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,730 vs 82). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Bleed Overload Td has been hosted by 15 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.