WC3 TrackerMapsBattle Tanks vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle Tanks vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 462. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3.7), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 9.2 min for Battle Tanks. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Battle Tanks Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBattle TanksDirect Strike
Total sessions46247,450
Unique hosts691,615
Avg players/lobby3.75.3
Avg lobby open time9.2 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)2369,760
Tracked versions21104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
227
8,392
Jun 26
664
30,642
Jul 26
339
14,025

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle Tanks and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 462 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Battle Tanks (3.7).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 9.2 min for Battle Tanks. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,760 vs 236). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle Tanks has been hosted by 69 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.