WC3 TrackerMapsBattle Royale Reborn vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle Royale Reborn vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 21. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.4), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 1.8 min for Battle Royale Reborn. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Battle Royale Reborn Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBattle Royale RebornDirect Strike
Total sessions2147,450
Unique hosts61,615
Avg players/lobby1.45.3
Avg lobby open time1.8 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)89,786
Tracked versions4104
Last hostedJul 10, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
1
8,392
Jun 26
15
30,642
Jul 26
16
13,912

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle Royale Reborn and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 21 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Battle Royale Reborn (1.4).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 1.8 min for Battle Royale Reborn. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,786 vs 8). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle Royale Reborn has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.