WC3 TrackerMapsBattle For Middle Earth vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Battle For Middle Earth vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for Battle For Middle Earth. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Battle For Middle Earth Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricBattle For Middle EarthDirect Strike
Total sessions747,430
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby1.25.3
Avg lobby open time2.6 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)010,027
Tracked versions2104
Last hostedJun 12, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
7
30,642
Jul 26
0
13,801

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Battle For Middle Earth and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Battle For Middle Earth (1.2).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 2.6 min for Battle For Middle Earth. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,027 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Battle For Middle Earth has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.