WC3 TrackerMapsAsdfwq vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Asdfwq vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 288. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.6), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.7 min for Asdfwq. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Asdfwq Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAsdfwqDirect Strike
Total sessions28847,450
Unique hosts101,615
Avg players/lobby1.65.3
Avg lobby open time3.7 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)89,819
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 5, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
52
8,392
Jun 26
89
30,642
Jul 26
15
13,973

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Asdfwq and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 288 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Asdfwq (1.6).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3.7 min for Asdfwq. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,819 vs 8). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Asdfwq has been hosted by 10 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.