WC3 TrackerMapsAsdfgv vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Asdfgv vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,488 recorded sessions versus 10. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 2.1), suggesting larger games. Asdfgv lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Asdfgv Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAsdfgvDirect Strike
Total sessions1047,488
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby2.15.3
Avg lobby open time1.5 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)09,730
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJun 22, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
10
30,642
Jul 26
0
14,415

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Asdfgv and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,488 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 10 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Asdfgv (2.1).
Asdfgv lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.5 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,730 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Asdfgv has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.