WC3 TrackerMapsArcher Survival vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Archer Survival vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,587 recorded sessions versus 324. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 3.4), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for Archer Survival. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Archer Survival Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricArcher SurvivalDirect Strike
Total sessions32447,587
Unique hosts261,615
Avg players/lobby3.45.3
Avg lobby open time3 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)1969,859
Tracked versions7104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
57
8,392
Jun 26
74
30,642
Jul 26
205
14,529

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Archer Survival and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,587 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 324 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Archer Survival (3.4).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 3 min for Archer Survival. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,859 vs 196). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Archer Survival has been hosted by 26 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.