WC3 TrackerMapsAmazonia S vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Amazonia S vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 48,241 recorded sessions versus 13. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.2), suggesting larger games. Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Amazonia S Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAmazonia SDirect Strike
Total sessions1348,241
Unique hosts61,615
Avg players/lobby1.25.3
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)710,070
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
5
8,392
Jun 26
18
30,642
Jul 26
14
15,869

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Amazonia S and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 48,241 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 13 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Amazonia S (1.2).
Amazonia S lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,070 vs 7). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Amazonia S has been hosted by 6 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.