WC3 TrackerMapsAgd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,430 recorded sessions versus 7. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.1), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 7.4 min for Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v). Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAgd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v)Direct Strike
Total sessions747,430
Unique hosts31,615
Avg players/lobby1.15.3
Avg lobby open time7.4 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)010,027
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJun 27, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
8
30,642
Jul 26
0
13,801

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,430 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 7 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) (1.1).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 7.4 min for Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v). A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (10,027 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Agd Beta 1.08a(K1.0v) has been hosted by 3 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.