WC3 TrackerMapsAbiogenesis vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

Abiogenesis vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 48,241 recorded sessions versus 23. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 1.3), suggesting larger games. Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 13.6 min for Abiogenesis. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

Abiogenesis Direct Strike
Head to Head
MetricAbiogenesisDirect Strike
Total sessions2348,241
Unique hosts41,615
Avg players/lobby1.35.3
Avg lobby open time13.6 min1.7 min
Sessions (30d)39,940
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedJul 11, 2026Jul 12, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
4
8,392
Jun 26
38
30,642
Jul 26
8
15,748

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing Abiogenesis and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 48,241 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 23 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than Abiogenesis (1.3).
Direct Strike lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.7 min on average versus 13.6 min for Abiogenesis. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,940 vs 3). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
Abiogenesis has been hosted by 4 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.