WC3 TrackerMaps5329 vs Solar Conquest
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

5329 vs Solar Conquest

5329 is the more popular of the two, with 10,284 recorded sessions versus 21. 5329 averages more players per lobby (4.9 vs 3), suggesting larger games. 5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. Over the past 30 days, 5329 has seen more activity.

5329 Solar Conquest
Head to Head
Metric5329Solar Conquest
Total sessions10,284 21
Unique hosts486 3
Avg players/lobby4.9 3
Avg lobby open time2.6 min 20.6 min
Sessions (30d)786 1
Tracked versions574
Last hostedJul 12, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
3,425
13
Jun 26
5,468
8
Jul 26
1,249
1

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 5329 and Solar Conquest on Warcraft 3

5329 is more popular, with 10,284 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 21 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
5329 has more players per lobby on average (4.9) than Solar Conquest (3).
5329 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 2.6 min on average versus 20.6 min for Solar Conquest. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
5329 has had more sessions in the last 30 days (786 vs 1). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
5329 has been hosted by 486 unique BattleTags and Solar Conquest by 3. 5329 has the wider host base.