WC3 TrackerMaps1902 vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1902 vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 3. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 2), suggesting larger games. 1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

1902 Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric1902Warofraces
Total sessions37,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby24.6
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,588
Tracked versions137
Last hostedMay 18, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
0
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,252

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1902 and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than 1902 (2).
1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,588 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1902 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.