WC3 TrackerMaps1902 vs Direct Strike
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

1902 vs Direct Strike

Direct Strike is the more popular of the two, with 47,450 recorded sessions versus 3. Direct Strike averages more players per lobby (5.3 vs 2), suggesting larger games. 1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. Over the past 30 days, Direct Strike has seen more activity.

1902 Direct Strike
Head to Head
Metric1902Direct Strike
Total sessions347,450
Unique hosts11,615
Avg players/lobby25.3
Avg lobby open time0.4 min 1.7 min
Sessions (30d)09,812
Tracked versions1104
Last hostedMay 18, 2026Jul 10, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
8,392
Jun 26
0
30,642
Jul 26
0
13,846

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 1902 and Direct Strike on Warcraft 3

Direct Strike is more popular, with 47,450 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 3 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Direct Strike has more players per lobby on average (5.3) than 1902 (2).
1902 lobbies fill faster, sitting open 0.4 min on average versus 1.7 min for Direct Strike. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Direct Strike has had more sessions in the last 30 days (9,812 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
1902 has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Direct Strike by 1,615. Direct Strike has the wider host base.