WC3 TrackerMaps000v3.2 Fabu vs Warofraces
Warcraft 3 Map Comparison

000v3.2 Fabu vs Warofraces

Warofraces is the more popular of the two, with 7,636 recorded sessions versus 20. Warofraces averages more players per lobby (4.6 vs 1.1), suggesting larger games. 000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. Over the past 30 days, Warofraces has seen more activity.

000v3.2 Fabu Warofraces
Head to Head
Metric000v3.2 FabuWarofraces
Total sessions207,636
Unique hosts1258
Avg players/lobby1.14.6
Avg lobby open time1.1 min 4 min
Sessions (30d)01,568
Tracked versions137
Last hostedJun 20, 2026Jul 11, 2026
Monthly Activity (last 3 mo)
May 26
0
1,531
Jun 26
20
4,233
Jul 26
0
2,323

Frequently Asked Questions

Comparing 000v3.2 Fabu and Warofraces on Warcraft 3

Warofraces is more popular, with 7,636 total sessions tracked on Warcraft 3 Battle.net compared to 20 for the other. Popularity can shift over time — WC3 Tracker records live lobby activity across all servers.
Warofraces has more players per lobby on average (4.6) than 000v3.2 Fabu (1.1).
000v3.2 Fabu lobbies fill faster, sitting open 1.1 min on average versus 4 min for Warofraces. A shorter open time usually means a healthier, more in-demand map.
Warofraces has had more sessions in the last 30 days (1,568 vs 0). Check the live lobby browser on WC3 Tracker for current activity.
000v3.2 Fabu has been hosted by 1 unique BattleTags and Warofraces by 258. Warofraces has the wider host base.